Comparison Between Samsung 870 Qvo Vs 860 Evo (Difference)

Post Disclaimer

We independently review everything we recommend. The information is provided by Comparison Between Samsung 870 Qvo Vs 860 Evo (Difference) and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we may earn a commission if you buy something through links on our post. Learn more

Here is detailed information and guidelines about Samsung 870 Qvo Vs 860 Evo. Since 2018, Samsung’s 860 SSD had already been the golden benchmark for PC hardware, but that may be changing. The business is launching a new model, the 870 Evo, according to The Verge. It comes with Samsung’s newest SATA SSD, which is geared for user navigation and offers the company’s quickest speed to date at a cheaper price.

Samsung 870 Qvo Vs 860 Evo

The primary distinction between the Samsung SSD 860 EVO and SSD 870 QVO is their NAND flash architecture. The 860 EVO contains TLC memory, which tends to be faster and can store three bits per cell.

Samsung 870 Qvo Vs 860

Samsung’s latest version of their general customer TLC-based SATA SSDs is the 870 Evo. The 870 EVO appears to have the same generational improvements as the 870 QVO in terms of Samsung’s 3D NAND & SSD controller. After the launch of the Samsung 860 EVO, the upgrade of the latest EVO SATA SSD has become the new standard.

Previously, the jump from 850 to 860 was not a significant one. There were only a few minor enhancements. A 64-layer 3D NAND swap, an upgraded MJX SSD controller, & LPDDR4 Dram alternatively of LPDDR3 Dram are anticipated to be the most important changes. However, as compared to the 860, the new 870 features several notable differences, including an unquestionably quicker speed at a lower price.

Differences Between 870 Qvo Vs 860 Evo

Let’s compare the Samsung 860 EVO to Samsung’s other lower-cost 2.5 SSD options now that we know it’s an excellent SSD in terms of performance and value. The Samsung 860 QVO is available in three capacities: one, two, and four terabytes, with consecutive read and write rates of 550 and 520 megabytes per second, respectively (on paper).

The reading and writing speeds for 4KB QD1 are 7,500 & 42,000 IOPS, respectively, while the read or write speeds for 4KB QD32 is 97,000 (96,000 again for 1TB) and 89,000 IOPS. Depending on the storage size, the average power consumption ranges from 2.1W/2.2W to 2.3W/3.1W. For its three sizes, the TBW numbers are 360 TB, 720 TB, and 1,440 TB, respectively.

Samsung has now released a firmware upgrade for the 860 QVO, dubbed the 870 QVO. The 870 QVO has comparable average power consumption, 4-bit V-NAND MLC, TBW ratings, and storage size options albeit it does include an enormous 8 TB option as well.

With a slightly quicker read and write speed of 10MB/s, as well as a quicker 4KB Random talk or read speeds of 98,000 IOPS (QD32) or 11,000 and 35,000 IOPS (QD32), the 860 QVO appears to be a better option (QD1).

The 860 and 870 QVOs both have a three-year warranty, while the 860 EVO has a five-year warranty. In regards to average customer benchmarks, we observe a significant efficiency advantage for one of the two when contrasting the 860 QVO with the 860 EVO.

The EVO has a 14 percent faster total effective speed, with sequential read and writes speeds of 480 and 395 MB/s (vs. 38.1, 93.7, and 51.4 MB/s for the EVO), and 4K read, write, & mixed speeds of 30.3, 92.4, and 42.2 MB/s (vs. 38.1, 93.7, as well as 51.4 MB/s for the EVO). The EVO has a large edge in sustained write rates, reaching 417 MB/s versus 335 MB/s for the QVO.

Whenever it comes to gaming, the loading speeds of the SSD card are essential. You should expect prolonged loading times and instability during games if the SSD’s loan rates are extremely low. The better your overall performance will be, the faster your SSD loads.

When you utilize an SSD as your start drive, your computer will start up much faster. While utilizing an SSD card will improve your overall loading rates regardless of its speed, the faster the card is, the greater your gameplay will be.

When comparing SATA and NVMe SSDs, both are excellent. While the NVMe drives may offer faster performance, the SATA drives are more than sufficient. They are also the most cost-effective solution. When comparing these four SSDs, the consecutive speed is the most important factor to consider. With 560MB/s, the 870 QVO was the fastest. The other three SSDs were able to transfer data at a rate of 550MB/s.

While the difference is minor, it is important. The 870 QVO also outperforms the other models in sequential write speed, at 530MB/s versus 520MB/s for the other versions. Overall, the 870 QVO is a superb pick if you want the fastest load times for your gaming PC.

It’s difficult to claim that it does in most circumstances. For gaming and desktop apps, there isn’t much of a difference between the two SSDs, and the price difference is only worthwhile if you plan on transferring significant amounts of data for serious workstation applications.

Is 860 EVO Or 870 QVO Better?

The NAND flash is the primary difference between the Samsung SSD 860 EVO and the Samsung SSD 870 QVO. The 860 EVO uses TLC memory, which can store three bits per cell and is often faster.

Is EVO Or QVO Better For Gaming?

Both the QVO and EVO product lines are excellent options if you’re searching for an SSD. If you’re attempting to pick between the two, start by considering your use case. The QVO drives are more than enough if all you want to do is switch from an HDD to an SSD for gaming.


The best SSD from the three alternatives four with both the Samsung 870 Qvo Vs 860 Evo will ultimately be determined by the planned purpose. The 860 EVO is the way to go if you’re looking for a high-performance 2.5 SSD to install on a workstation, however, the 8 TB 870 QVO may also be appealing.

For any form of use, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to suggest the 860 PRO over the EVO. We don’t have a lot of user benchmarks to compare the 870 QVO to respectively the 860 QVO and the EVO, however, AnandTech’s benchmarks reveal that the 870 and 860 QVO have minor differences overall, but the EVO still outperforms both.

The 860 QVO looks to be the greatest price-to-value choice of all the above Samsung SSDs for the vast proportion of PC users. Sure, it has a 14 percent performance decrease when compared to the EVO, but for most users, this actual speed difference would be barely apparent, If you’re a competitive gamer who cares about fractions of a second, the 860 EVO might be worth the money, but for most people, the 860 QVO is the best option.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the difference between the 860 EVO and the 870 QVO from Samsung?

A new Samsung MKX controller is combined with a 4bit MLC V-NAND flash in the Samsung 870 QVO. Its predecessor, the Samsung 860 QVO, employs a 4bit MLC V-NAND flash as well; however, it is controlled by an older MJX controller. The 860 EVO, on the other hand, employs an MJX controller but with a superior 3bit MLC NAND flash.

Is the Samsung 860 EVO superior to the QVO?

The 860 QVO is less expensive than the 860 EVO, however, it comes at the cost of speed, endurance/reliability, and warranty. The 860 QVO has the identical Turbo Write capacity as the 860 EVO for 1TB and 4TB, but the 2TB capacity has a greater Turbo Write capacity.

Is 870 QVO preferable to 860 QVO?

When it comes to optimum sequential read, maximum sequential write, and maximum random read speeds, the Samsung 870 QVO is somewhat faster than the Samsung 860 QVO. The Samsung 860 QVO, on the other hand, is a touch faster in regards to the maximum random write speed.

Is Pro superior to EVO?

The PRO outperforms the EVO in mixed workloads by a hair. However, the differences aren’t significant; in many cases, there isn’t much of a gap between the parties. Samsung’s entire line of hard drives varies in terms of storage capacity.

Similar Posts